下载App
资质规则
旅行
账户
SBJHBarnet
Hot Afternoon at Greys Court 23rd July 2026
Grey's Court的点评
点评：This has been on our “must visit” list for a long time and we finally got there on a hot July afternoon. Ample parking on arrival, including dedicated Blue Badge spaces but a long walk to the house awaits after that if the infrequent buggy service is unavailable. The signage within the site and the house also left a lot to be desired and we did not find it easy getting around. Even inside the house there was no marked route through the accessible parts The grounds plan handout seemed to bear little resemblance in parts to reality and we never did find the Ice House despite searching for it on the supposed location on the plan! A simple directional sign was all that was needed for this and many other features
There seemed to be ample locations for a few blue badge parking spaces much nearer the house, judging by the number of staff and contractor vehicles, and the National Trust could do better in this respect, as we also commented on finding the same problems at Wimpole Hall. Another repeat oddity from Wimpole Hall was an excellent pianist playing loudly in one of the rooms of the house, but which was distracting when trying to concentrate on the exhibits.
Despite the issues we mention, the house and grounds are well worth visiting. It is open for far more of the year than most National Trust properties seem to be. It looks just as it was when the last owners Sir Felix (died 1982) and Lady Elizabeth Brunner (died 2003) continued to live there after handing it over to the National Trust in 1969. It still felt lived-in. Everywhere was well-maintained and there is a well-stocked gift shop. Staff were very friendly and unobtrusively helpful.
The Well House was disappointing because it was shuttered and nothing of any interest internally could be seen. All that was of use to visitors was a descriptive panel outside! There was also an archaeological dig in progress and more visible information about that and its findings would have given added interest to the visit.
There seemed to be ample locations for a few blue badge parking spaces much nearer the house, judging by the number of staff and contractor vehicles, and the National Trust could do better in this respect, as we also commented on finding the same problems at Wimpole Hall. Another repeat oddity from Wimpole Hall was an excellent pianist playing loudly in one of the rooms of the house, but which was distracting when trying to concentrate on the exhibits.
Despite the issues we mention, the house and grounds are well worth visiting. It is open for far more of the year than most National Trust properties seem to be. It looks just as it was when the last owners Sir Felix (died 1982) and Lady Elizabeth Brunner (died 2003) continued to live there after handing it over to the National Trust in 1969. It still felt lived-in. Everywhere was well-maintained and there is a well-stocked gift shop. Staff were very friendly and unobtrusively helpful.
The Well House was disappointing because it was shuttered and nothing of any interest internally could be seen. All that was of use to visitors was a descriptive panel outside! There was also an archaeological dig in progress and more visible information about that and its findings would have given added interest to the visit.
翻译：这个地方早就列在我们的“必游之地”清单上，终于我们在七月的一个闷热下午抵达了那里。到达后发现有充足的停车位，还包括专门给残障人士使用的蓝色标志停车位。不过，如果偶尔才运行的接驳车服务恰好 unavailable，就需要步行很长的距离才能到达主楼。园区内及大楼里的指示牌也相当不完善，让我们在四处走动时倍感困难。即使在房屋内部，也看不到任何标识清晰的通道通往可进入的区域。那份场地平面图在某些地方似乎与实际情况大相径庭；尽管我们按照图纸上的位置寻找，却始终没能找到冰库！其实，只需一个简单的指示牌就能解决这个问题，对很多其他设施来说也是如此。
从工作人员和施工车辆的数量来看，房屋附近似乎有足够的地方可以设置几处蓝牌残疾人专用停车位。国家信托基金在这方面本可以做得更好，正如我们之前提到的，在温波尔庄园也发现了同样的问题。另一个与温波尔庄园类似的怪现象是：有位出色的钢琴家在宅邸的某个房间里大声演奏，但这在人们试图专心欣赏展品时造成了干扰。
尽管存在上述问题，这座宅邸及其庭院依然非常值得一游。它全年开放的时间也远多于大多数国家信托基金管理的房产。这座房子的样貌与1969年最后一批主人——费利克斯爵士（1982年去世）和伊丽莎白·布鲁纳夫人（2003年去世）——将房产交给国家信托机构后仍居住于此时的模样别无二致。房子仍给人一种有人居住的感觉。各处都维护得很好，还设有一家商品种类丰富的纪念品商店。工作人员十分友善，也乐于提供帮助，且不会过分打扰游客。
“井屋”则令人失望，因为它紧闭着门，根本看不到内部有任何值得一看的东西。对游客来说，唯一有用的信息就是外面的说明牌！当时还有一项考古挖掘正在进行中，如果能提供更多关于此项发掘及其发现的信息，定能增加参观的趣味性。
从工作人员和施工车辆的数量来看，房屋附近似乎有足够的地方可以设置几处蓝牌残疾人专用停车位。国家信托基金在这方面本可以做得更好，正如我们之前提到的，在温波尔庄园也发现了同样的问题。另一个与温波尔庄园类似的怪现象是：有位出色的钢琴家在宅邸的某个房间里大声演奏，但这在人们试图专心欣赏展品时造成了干扰。
尽管存在上述问题，这座宅邸及其庭院依然非常值得一游。它全年开放的时间也远多于大多数国家信托基金管理的房产。这座房子的样貌与1969年最后一批主人——费利克斯爵士（1982年去世）和伊丽莎白·布鲁纳夫人（2003年去世）——将房产交给国家信托机构后仍居住于此时的模样别无二致。房子仍给人一种有人居住的感觉。各处都维护得很好，还设有一家商品种类丰富的纪念品商店。工作人员十分友善，也乐于提供帮助，且不会过分打扰游客。
“井屋”则令人失望，因为它紧闭着门，根本看不到内部有任何值得一看的东西。对游客来说，唯一有用的信息就是外面的说明牌！当时还有一项考古挖掘正在进行中，如果能提供更多关于此项发掘及其发现的信息，定能增加参观的趣味性。
© 2026 Tripadvisor 版权所有。
部分照片由 VFM Leonardo 提供。
TripAdvisor公司对外部网站的内容一概不负责。优惠价格中不含税和其他费用。
ICP证：沪B2-20200433
沪ICP备20013175号
沪公网安备31010502005427号鹰程信息技术（上海）有限公司
